雅思写作大作文高分范文：如何更好地解决环境问题

Many people are afraid to leave their homes because of their fear of crime. Some believe that more actions should be taken to prevent crime, but others feel that little can be done. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
雅思写作题目讲解：
对立双方题型属于大作文的“主流题型”，这一大类分为三小类。就“对想法的限制程度”上来说，这三小类有所区别。广大同学对此应有所理解，以此来使得自己的作文做到好的“task response”。这三小类具体的差别，大家可以看该博客另一篇博文，里面有细致的讲解。
该雅思写作题目的对立双方：
一方： 相关7a64e59b9ee7ad94330措施对减少社会犯罪率有效的理由
另一方：相关措施几乎对减少社会犯罪率无效的理由
(注意加粗斜体部分)
今天考试的雅思写作题目的特点是对想法有比较大的限制，双方的理由必须围绕着一个社会的犯罪率是否因此减少，如果同学们的idea没能往这个点靠拢，那这个 idea就跑题了。做个假设：如果同学们将“政府应该加大惩罚的力度”，“媒体应该让更多人知道一些罪犯是如何设置骗局”，这两个idea作为一方的理 由，这两个想法无法做到很好的切题。因为该题首先考的不是应该采取哪些方式，而是为什么这些方式有效，或者无效!
能够做到“切题”的idea：(同学们仔细对比下面的两个理由同上述两个稍跑题理由的区别)
一方： 相关措施能够减少社会犯罪率的理由
1. 政府采取的严厉的惩罚能够震慑潜在的罪犯
2. 媒体对于常见诈骗方式的报道防止更多的人受骗
另一方：相关措施几乎不能减少社会犯罪率的理由
1. 犯罪率高很大程度上是一个社会的经济程度发达程度，财富分配，贫富差距来决定的，上述的理由无法根本上，长远的解决问题。
下面给大家提供一方观点的其中一个理由的具体行文：
社会的犯罪率部分取决于政府对待罪犯的严厉程度，一个理性的潜在的罪犯将停止对社会的伤害，当他意识到自己可能付出的代价大大超过了可能带来的利益。 一个将抢劫犯处以终身监禁的社会所面临的犯罪问题少于其他的更加仁慈社会。
The crime rate of a society is partly determined by the level to which a criminal is penalized. Potential criminals, provided rational enough, will stop their act at the thought that the possible price they might pay would greatly outweigh the possible benefit they may acquire. And the effect of harsher punishment in deterring criminals can also be evidenced by the fact that a society treating a robber with lifelong sentence faces fewer crime problems than its counterparts with more merciful measures.

雅思写作大作文范文
Nowadays, whether evaluating and criticizing teachers should be supported in the classroom has become a controversial issue. From my perspective, evaluation and criticism of teachers are necessary for the improvement of education if they are objective and reasonable.
现在，是否应该在课堂上对教师进行评价和批判，已经成为一个有争议的问题。从我的观点来看，如果教育是客观合理的，那么对教师的评价和批评是必要的。
On the one hand, proposing changes to teachers’ lesson content contributes to the improvement of teaching quality. Usually, it is difficult for teachers to realize the mistakes and slips in their teaching unless students remind them. Additionally, teachers may not clearly know what students have known and want to know when planning their lessons. If students can put forward their ideas and suggestions towards the lesson, it will be of great help for teachers to upgrade the teaching projects. Moreover, trying to evaluate teachers’ lesson is particularly beneficial for students’ academic and career development in the future. The modern education emphasizes criticism and innovation. Undoubtedly, it is an effective way for students to debate or discuss with teachers.
一方面，对教师教学内容进行改革，有助于提高教学质量。通常情况下，教师很难意识到这些错误并在教学中疏忽，除非学生们提醒他们。此外，老师可能不清楚学生在计划课程时所知道的和想要知道的内容。如果学生能对课程提出自己的想法和建议，对教师进行教学改革将有很大的帮助。此外，试着评价教师的课程对学生将来的学业和职业发展有很大的帮助。现代教育强调批评和创新。毫无疑问，这是学生与老师辩论或讨论的有效方式。
On the other hand, the disruptive students will probably disturb the class and negatively affect both teaching and learning outcomes. When students voice their opinions in the classroom, it will be hard to maintain the order and discipline and the teachers may feel disrespected. Also, students will suffer a loss in terms of knowledge and other learning content. This is because teachers always devote much to delivering knowledge and explaining theories. If they are disrupted, the teaching plan may not be able to be fulfilled. As a result, both teachers and students have to face a loss in the quality of education.
另一方面，破坏性的学生可能会扰乱课堂，对教学和学习成果都产生负面影响。当学生在课堂上表达自己的观点时，很难维持秩序和纪律，而老师们可能会感到不受尊重。此外，学生在知识和其他学习内容方面也会遭受损失。这是因为老师总是在传授知识和解释理论方面投入很多。如果他们被打乱了，教学计划可能无法实现。因此，教师和学生都必须面对教育质量的下降。
To sum up, it can be recommended that students evaluate and criticize teachers in the classroom on the premise that they have decent manners without disturbing the learning atmosphere. Only in this way will teachers and students achieve a win-win outcome in education.
总而言之，我们可以建议学生在课堂上评价和批评老师，前提是他们有礼貌，不会影e799bee5baa6e79fa5e98193e59b9ee7ad94364响学习气氛。只有这样，教师和学生才能在教育上实现双赢。

As a necessary tool in daily life, vehicles, cars and airplanes in particular, have empowered people to go wherever they want, yet are frequently blamed for environmental problems. But it appears to me that in an attempt to address these problems, the simple rise of fuel prices is feasible but not the most effective and efficient solution.
作为日常生活中必不可少的工具，特别是汽车、汽车和飞机，让人们可以去任何他们想去的地方，却常常被指责为环境问题的罪魁祸首。但在我看来，为了解决这些问题，燃料e68a84e8a2ade799bee5baa6e997aee7ad94339价格的简单上涨是可行的，但不是最有效和最有效的解决方案。
Higher fuel cost in theory will reduce air pollution and relieve the fuel shortage. This is mainly because the higher the price of fuel is, the fewer drivers will afford it and cars and other vehicles will be used even less. The emission of greenhouse gases, the main contributor of global warming, will therefore decline and fewer fuels are consumed. However, this is not that simple in real life.Unable to drive cars as usual or to choose other transportation, workers will hardly work efficiently as most of them in today’s world rely heavily on cars and different vehicles especially for long distance commuters. In this case, they would rather pay the higher price than earn less or even lose their job.
理论上，燃料成本上升将减少空气污染，缓解燃料短缺。这主要是因为燃料价格越高，就会有更少的司机负担得起，而汽车和其他车辆的使用将会更少。温室气体的排放，是全球变暖的主要原因，将因此减少，减少燃料消耗。然而，在现实生活中，这并不是那么简单。由于无法像往常一样开车或选择其他交通工具，工人们很难有效地工作，因为在当今世界，大多数人都严重依赖汽车和不同的车辆，尤其是长途通勤者。在这种情况下，他们宁愿付出更高的代价，也不愿赚得更少，甚至丢掉工作。
Increasing the cost of fuel could not resolve all environmental problems. During the delivery of oil to different places around the world, oil more often than not leaks into the oceans and contaminates the water, a severe environmental problem that seems to be unsolvable now. What’s worse, marine animals will die mainly because their habitat, the ocean, has been polluted and become inhabitable.
增加燃料的成本并不能解决所有的环境问题。在向世界各地输送石油的过程中，石油往往会泄漏到海洋中，污染水源，这是一个严重的环境问题，现在看来是无法解决的。更糟糕的是，海洋动物将会死亡，主要是因为它们的栖息地，海洋，已经被污染，并变得适宜居住。
This suggestion is less workable than other measures,like taking advantage of some cutting-edge technology and science to actively seek alternative fuel. For example, mainly powered by clean fuels or electricity,some fuel-efficient vehicles and electric cars, both of which have been widely used in most places of the world, not just burn less fuel but generate few emission.
这一建议比其他措施更不可行，比如利用一些尖端技术和科学，积极寻找替代燃料。例如，主要由清洁燃料或电力驱动，一些省油的汽车和电动汽车，这两种燃料在世界上的大多数地方都被广泛使用，不仅燃烧较少的燃料，而且产生很少的排放。
In conclusion, viable as it is , increasing the cost of fuels is not ideal and to a larger extent fails to be realistic and other ways need to be introduced.